I recommend minor revision
WebJul 13, 2024 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). I … WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further …
I recommend minor revision
Did you know?
WebResponse: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for publication. WebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection …
WebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. WebAccept with Minor Revision This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Sample reviewer comments: “ This paper proposes a novel approach towards solving the reconstruction problem of motion corrupted fetal MRI.
WebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review … WebMinor revision. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. These changes can usually …
WebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why.
WebMar 13, 2024 · Minor revision: The paper is almost accepted. Only a few minor changes or clarifications are needed. Receiving this output from good journals is very rare. It happens in less than 10% of submissions. Major revision: The paper could be accepted after some significant changes. This means it’s going to be a second round of revision. iracing best graphic settingwWeb1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … orchy toowoombaWebMinor revisions - the best you can hope for after the first round of review Major revisions - the decision we received in this case Reject – clearly, the one you want to avoid Editors … iracing benchmark toolWebrecommend this manuscript to be published with a minor revision. • Response: The comments and suggestionsfrom the referee#1 are greatly appreciated. All technical … orchy paisleyWebApr 6, 2024 · I recommend minor revisions after addressing the few comments below. Overall, some confusion still persists regarding their O2 threshold used to define hypoxia. In their response, they explain that they considered 20 M as a upper threshold below which denitrification and anammox occurs, i.e., fixed nitrogen is transformed to N2. ... orchyd facebookWebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question iracing best settingsWebOverall, the revision is well organized and clearly presented. In particular, Figure 1 is very nice and helpful to understand the framework. In my opinion this paper is worth to be published in GMD. Response: Thank you very much for your previous comments that helped us improve this manuscript. Minor suggestions: orchy whisky